Help the stakeholders within the justice system to perform at optimal levels.



The success of the due administration of justice relies on the ability of key stakeholders within the justice system to perform at optimal levels. Unlike in the past, judges today face mounting challenges due to rapid advancements in technology, the pervasive influence of social media and the rise of artificial intelligence. In addition to these, judiciaries worldwide continue to grapple with numerous socio-economic, political, religious and context-specific challenges such as natural disasters, conflict situations and financial constraints. Despite these difficulties, judges must maintain their independence, impartiality, integrity and composure in the public eye. However, the toll this takes on them is rarely discussed in many parts of the world.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Disciplinary responsibility of judges is a cornerstone of judicial independence.

Image
Judges cannot decide freely and impartially if they fear disciplinary consequences - especially the risk of dismissal - for their rulings. That is why the structure and functioning of disciplinary bodies are crucial.  Key considerations include: who elects their members; how decisions are made; the clarity and legal basis of disciplinary offences; the rules applied; fair trial guarantees; and the availability of remedies and judicial review. These elements are as vital to judicial independence as tenure security, merit-based appointments by an independent body, adequate remuneration and freedom of expression and association. Importantly, judges should not face disciplinary action for their legal interpretations, factual assessments or evidentiary evaluations – except in cases of malice and gross negligence. This principle also applies to civil and criminal liability of judges. Disciplinary proceedings should only occur when judges fail to perform their duties properly and efficie...
Read more

Offer a practical, judge-led approach to sustaining professional reflection in a complex and evolving judicial environment.

Image
In light of ongoing international efforts to promote the well-being of members of the judiciary, the Austrian Federal Administrative Court (Bundesverwaltungsgericht - BVwG) has established an initiative entitled Intervision , developed and implemented by judges for judges. This format offers a structured and confidential space for professional exchange and mutual support, complementing existing training programmes and professional development tools. Background and development The first considerations for introducing such a format began in October 2021, within the framework of the Association of Judges at the BVwG. After extensive discussions regarding scope, structure and feasibility - including questions of size, frequency, duration and available resources - the concept of Intervision gradually took shape. The aim was to create an accessible, low-threshold forum open to all judges of the court , regardless of their membership in the association. Intervision is understood as a form o...
Read more